United States  

Celebrating 10 Years of Trusted News Discovery
One News Page
> >

Scientific journal pulls paper about Syria chemical attack

Video Credit: TomoNews US - Duration: 07:55s - Published < > Embed
Scientific journal pulls paper about Syria chemical attack

Scientific journal pulls paper about Syria chemical attack

KHAN SHAYKHUN, SYRIA — In 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump launched 59 Tomahawk missiles at a Syrian airbase, in retaliation for a heinous chemical attack it claimed Syria carried out on its own people.

But was it really the Syrian government who was responsible, or have we been fed a narrative that may not actually be true?

According to the OPCW-UN Joint Investigative Mechanism, on the morning of April 4, 2017, a chemical bomb suspected to contain sarin gas was dropped from an aircraft over the rebel-held Syrian town of Khan Shaykhun.

The bomb allegedly struck the middle of a road, creating a crater 1.5 to 1.65 meters in diameter and half a meter deep, and releasing sarin gas upon impact.

According to an April 7 report by the Idlib Health Directorate, the gas dispersed through the town, resulting in the deaths of 89 people, 33 of them children.

541 others were injured.

UN investigators later released a report confirming evidence of sarin being dropped from a plane, and stating the Syrian government, led by Bashar al-Assad, was responsible for the April 4 attack.

Now, a controversial paper authored by MIT professor emeritus Theodore Postol and other experts is challenging the mainstream narrative.

Using computational forensic analysis on the crater, Postol et.

Al found that its size and shape, as well as damage to a pipe thought to be the sarin vessel, is inconsistent with an aerial bomb.

Instead, detonation and impact simulations indicate that it may have been generated by a 122-millimeter artillery rocket armed with a high-explosive warhead — a weapon the Syrian government does not have a monopoly on.

This type of munition could not have been used as a delivery device for sarin, since based on the analysis, the rocket's volume would be used up by the propellant and the warhead.

The split pipe identified as a sarin container by the Joint Investigative Mechanism is likely just the casing of the rocket motor that propelled the warhead to the explosion site.

Postol et al.

Also analyzed photographic evidence of the crater, in particular two sets of images — one showing it with a red skeletal marker, and one without.

Advanced deterioration on the crater and the disappearance of loose debris in one set of images indicate they were taken at a later time and possibly modified.

The position of the damaged pipe also changes — bending outward in one set, and inward in another.

According to Science, Postol's controversial report was initially set to be published in Science & Global Security, a prestigious scientific journal.

But the publication has gone back on its decision, citing several unspecified issues.

0
shares
ShareTweetSavePostSend
 

You Might Like


Tweets about this


Recent related videos from verified sources

Scientific journal pulls paper questioning Syria sarin gas attack [Video]Scientific journal pulls paper questioning Syria sarin gas attack

A scientific journal has pulled a controversial paper challenging the official narrative of the 2017 Syria gas attack.

Credit: Reuters - 3D Animations (Next Me     Duration: 03:02Published

Environmentally friendly: One News Page is hosted on servers powered solely by renewable energy
© 2019 One News Page Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
About us  |  Contact us  |  Disclaimer  |  Press Room  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Content Accreditation
 RSS  |  News for my Website  |  Free news search widget  |  In the News  |  DMCA / Content Removal  |  Privacy & Data Protection Policy
How are we doing? FeedbackSend us your feedback  |   LIKE us on Facebook   FOLLOW us on Twitter  •  FOLLOW us on Pinterest
One News® is a registered trademark of One News Page Ltd.